Almost all users of this software find it essential to run "reports" of one type or another, for one reason or another. Everything you print out is the software's "report" of what you've entered. Your database software (and others of its type) uses the word "report" for whatever type of print-out you want to run from the data you've entered. You specifically mentioned "reports." This word needs clarification. In short, our decision as to the type of citation we create depends upon our purpose and our audience. However, a magazine that produces "light reading"-and traditional encyclopedias that provide overviews of a subject-will typically omit all reference notes and substitute a very short source list as "suggested reading." ![]() Well-done, published genealogies also rarely include a back-of-the-book Source List, because a well-researched family will include thousands upon thousands of sources, most of them in manuscript form, as opposed to the "list of books" (bibliographies) one commonly sees in books by other types of historians. In the history field, they are not common for short works because they would repeat (in alphabetical order), the sources already identified in the footnotes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |